Legal routes to a peptide treatment in the Netherlands

In short

About 7 minutes for the short version; 9 with every detail open.

  • For a drug that is approved, like semaglutide, the legal route is real: a doctor's prescription.
  • For peptides approved nowhere, like BPC-157, there is in practice no legal route now.
  • A doctor can ask for an exception for one patient, but only for real medical reasons.
  • A trial is the main legal way to use a medicine still being tested. Few test these peptides.
  • Talk to your doctor anyway. A doctor can check your health and look for tested options.
Last reviewed
An old brass mortar with two handles and a heavy brass pestle standing in it.
An old mortar from a pharmacy. A pharmacy may still make some medicines itself. Photo: Lupus in Saxonia (Wikimedia Commons) CC BY-SA 4.0 Image details

Each section starts with the short answer. The rest is folded under “In detail”.

Is there a legal way to get a peptide treatment?

For approved drugs, yes. For peptides approved nowhere, in practice no, except a trial.
The legal routes work for approved medicines. For a peptide approved nowhere, almost none fit. The Netherlands, checked on 22 October 2026. Each route is explained below.
Approved medicine (for example semaglutide)Peptide approved nowhere (for example BPC-157)
1. A prescription from your doctor?Yes If it fits your situation.1No There is no approved product to prescribe.2
2. Off-label prescribing?Unknown Mainly where a professional standard allows it. Otherwise only in rare cases, with the pharmacist.3,4No Off-label only applies to approved medicines.4
3. A doctor’s declaration (artsenverklaring)?Yes For medicines approved abroad but not here, if approved ones do not work for you.5No In practice not: it needs product files and quality proof that a research vial lacks.5
4. A pharmacy preparation?Unknown Possible in principle, if quality is assured. The licensed product is the usual route.2,6Unknown Only if the raw material meets an official quality standard. Without that, the IGJ says it “cannot simply be used”.6
5. A clinical trial?Yes If a trial runs and you qualify.7Unknown Only if a trial exists. We found none in the Netherlands.8
6. A compassionate use programme?Unknown Only for new medicines still in development.9No None exists for any peptide on this site.10

This page describes the legal channels. It does not help anyone get round the law. Your doctor is the starting point for all six routes. See talking to your doctor.

1. A prescription for an approved medicine

How do I get an approved peptide medicine?

Through your own doctor, who decides if it suits you, and a pharmacy.
The normal route for an approved medicine.
  1. Check that it is approved. The CBG’s medicines database lists every medicine approved in the Netherlands.11
  2. See a doctor who knows you. No one may prescribe online to someone they have never met, do not know, or whose medicine history they cannot see.12
  3. The doctor decides. A doctor must act as a good doctor would, in line with professional standards. So a doctor does not have to prescribe something just because you ask.13
  4. A pharmacy hands it over. Prescription medicines may only be handed over on a prescription, by a pharmacist or a dispensing GP.1

Semaglutide (Ozempic, Wegovy) and tirzepatide (Mounjaro) are approved in the EU.14,15 A “research” vial with the same name is a different, unlicensed product. See semaglutide.

2. Off-label prescribing

Can a doctor prescribe a medicine for another use?

Sometimes. Only if doctors’ own rules allow it, with extra care and your consent.
When a Dutch doctor may prescribe a medicine for a use it is not approved for.
SituationAllowed?
A professional standard allows itYes, following that standard
A professional standard advises against itNo
A standard is being writtenOnly after doctor and pharmacist talk it through, with extra care
There is no standard, and none is being writtenIn principle, no. Rare exceptions for one patient with no other option, after talking with the pharmacist

Sources 3, 4

Off-label means an approved medicine, used for something else. It cannot make an unapproved peptide available.4

In detail: The extra care the IGJ expects , about 1 minute to read

The IGJ updated its position on off-label prescribing in February 2026, and adjusted it in May 2026. Outside a standard, the doctor must weigh benefit against side effects on current science. The doctor must check your up-to-date medicine history. You must be told more than usual, and your explicit consent goes in your file. You are watched more closely for side effects.3

3. A doctor’s declaration (artsenverklaring)

Can my doctor ask for an exception?

Yes, for one patient, when the approved drugs cannot help you for a medical reason.
The three steps of supply on a doctor's declaration.
  1. Your doctor signs a declaration. You cannot be treated with medicines approved here, for medical reasons. The doctor accepts responsibility and the risk, and has told you the product was not checked for quality, safety and effect.16
  2. A pharmacy, wholesaler or manufacturer applies. Only a supplier based in the Netherlands can ask the IGJ for an exemption. You cannot apply yourself.5
  3. The IGJ decides. It has up to 8 weeks, about 4 on average. It may say no.16

The IGJ calls this an exception for individual treatment “in extreme cases”. It is not meant as a way round the licence rule.5

In detail: What the application must contain , about 1 minute to read

The legal basis is article 40(3)(c) of the Medicines Act and article 3.17 of the Medicines Regulation. The IGJ can grant the exemption only if all of these are true:2,17

  • the doctor finds the treatment necessary;
  • no adequate medicine is available in the Netherlands;
  • the supplier keeps records of amounts, patients and side effects.

In practice the IGJ asks for:5

  • a declaration signed by a doctor in the Dutch BIG register, with a patient code instead of your name, valid for one year;
  • on page 2, the treatments you already had or that were considered, and why approved medicines cannot be used;
  • the official product information from the country of origin, or, for a product approved nowhere, the Investigator’s Brochure or IMPD;
  • a valid GMP certificate when the product comes from outside the EEA, MRA countries and the UK, or comes from there without a licence.

Money, convenience or a different form of the same medicine are not accepted as reasons. The supplier must record side effects and report them to Lareb.5

In detail: Why this route does not fit BPC-157 and similar peptides , about 1 minute to read

Two documents are the problem. For a product approved nowhere, the IGJ asks for the trial files a company writes about it: the Investigator’s Brochure or the IMPD. It also asks for proof that the product was made under GMP.5 A vial sold for “research” comes with neither. A supplier would need a manufacturer that makes the peptide to medicine standards and can show it.

There must also be no adequate medicine for your condition on the Dutch market.17 The route is real for medicines approved in another country but not sold here.5

4. A pharmacy preparation (magistrale bereiding)

Can a pharmacy make a peptide for me?

Only if the raw material meets an official standard. The pharmacist must also be sure it is good.
What a pharmacy must be sure of before it makes a medicine itself.
  1. A prescription first. The prescription must exist before the medicine is made, for a patient who is known.18
  2. Small scale, in the pharmacy. The pharmacist makes it, or has it made, in small amounts in the pharmacy, and hands it over from there.2
  3. Raw material of known quality. It must meet the European Pharmacopoeia, or another official one.6
  4. The pharmacist must judge it. No regulator checks the preparation in advance, so the pharmacist must check the raw material’s file and the whole process.6

If a substance is in no official pharmacopoeia, the IGJ says it “cannot simply be used”. If the pharmacist is not sure about origin, quality and final checks, a pharmacy preparation is not a good choice.6

5. A clinical trial

Can I join a trial?

Perhaps. A trial is the main legal way to use a medicine still being tested, if you qualify.

No trial of BPC-157 runs in the Netherlands

0

trials of BPC-157 with a site in the Netherlands

What was counted ClinicalTrials.gov search of 22 October 2026. None running for TB-500, thymosin beta-4 or the other experimental peptides on this site either; elamipretide (SS-31) had three Dutch trials, all finished Source U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov (2026)8

But there are two trials of retatrutide here

2

trials of retatrutide with Dutch sites; one was still recruiting

What was counted ClinicalTrials.gov search of 22 October 2026 Sources U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov (2026); ClinicalTrials.gov (2026); ClinicalTrials.gov (2026)8,19,20

Taking part is always voluntary. A medical ethics committee (METC) must approve the study first. You can stop at any time without saying why, and you are insured for harm caused by the research.21

In detail: How to look for a trial, and what to expect , about 1 minute to read

Where to look. Ask your GP or specialist, or a patient organisation. You can also search the Dutch register Onderzoekmetmensen.nl, the EU’s public trial website, or ClinicalTrials.gov. The CCMO does not match people with studies.7,22

What it involves. You get written information and time to decide. You sign a consent form. There is often a check first to see if you can take part.21 In early trials (phase 1 and 2), patients usually do not get better from taking part. Patients usually get travel costs only, and do not pay for the study medicine.7

Your rights under EU law. The expected benefits must justify the risks. You can leave at any time without giving a reason and without any harm to you.23

The insurance has limits. Harm must be reported within four years. Harm you were told about in advance is usually not covered.21

6. A compassionate use programme

What is compassionate use?

A company gives a new medicine to very ill people before it is approved. The CBG must agree.
What must be true before a company may give a new medicine early.
  1. A group of seriously ill patients. The disease is long-term, seriously disabling or life-threatening.9
  2. No good approved treatment. Approved medicines do not treat it well enough.9
  3. A medicine in real development. A licence application has been filed, or trials are still running.9,24

The manufacturer applies, not the patient. The CBG’s list of approved programmes includes no peptide on this site.9,10

What this means for you

So what can I do?

Start with your doctor. Ask about approved medicines for your goal. If none fits, ask about trials.
  • Tell your doctor what you hope to achieve. There may be an approved treatment for it.
  • Ask whether an approved medicine could be prescribed, on-label or within a professional standard.
  • If approved medicines did not work for you, ask whether a doctor’s declaration is possible.
  • Ask your doctor or a patient organisation about trials that you might join.
  • If you use something already, say so. Your doctor can still help you check your health.

Sources 25, 3, 16, 7

A doctor must explain your options, including other treatments, and their risks.25 See talking to your doctor.

These routes are kept narrow on purpose, to protect the licence system.26 For someone whom approved treatments did not help, that can be a real cost. We discuss this on the case for reform.

Sources

Every claim on this page links to one of these sources. Scholarly sources link to their DOI; regulatory sources to the regulator's own page.

In detail: All 26 sources, numbered as in the text , about 5 minutes to read
  1. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2007). Geneesmiddelenwet, artikel 61 (wie UR-geneesmiddelen mag afleveren; geen aflevering zonder recept). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0021505), version in force from 9 September 2025. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  2. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2007). Geneesmiddelenwet, artikel 40 (verbod op geneesmiddelen zonder handelsvergunning, en de uitzonderingen). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0021505), version in force from 9 September 2025. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  3. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ) (2026). Standpunt IGJ over off-label voorschrijven (geactualiseerd februari 2026, aangepast mei 2026). Regulator igj.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  4. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2007). Geneesmiddelenwet, artikel 68 (voorschrijven buiten de geregistreerde indicaties). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0021505), version in force from 9 September 2025. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  5. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ) (2026). Vragen over afleveren geneesmiddelen zonder handelsvergunning. Regulator igj.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  6. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ) (2025). Eigen bereidingen apotheek. Regulator igj.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  7. Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) (2026). Achtergrondinformatie over meedoen aan onderzoek. Regulator ccmo.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  8. U.S. National Library of Medicine, ClinicalTrials.gov (2026). ClinicalTrials.gov API v2 searches: trials of BPC-157 and other peptides on this site with a site in the Netherlands or Belgium. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  9. College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG-MEB) (2026). Compassionate use programma. Regulator cbg-meb.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  10. College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG-MEB) (2026). Overzicht van goedgekeurde compassionate use programma's. Regulator cbg-meb.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  11. College ter Beoordeling van Geneesmiddelen (CBG-MEB) (2026). Geneesmiddeleninformatiebank (database of medicines authorised in the Netherlands). Regulator geneesmiddeleninformatiebank.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  12. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (2007). Geneesmiddelenwet, artikel 67 (geen recepten via internet voor onbekende patiënten). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0021505), version in force from 9 September 2025. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  13. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (1994). Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 7, artikel 453 (WGBO: zorg van een goed hulpverlener). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0005290), version in force from 8 October 2026. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  14. European Medicines Agency (2026). Wegovy (semaglutide): EPAR — overview and product information. Official product information ema.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  15. European Medicines Agency (2026). Mounjaro (tirzepatide): EPAR — overview and product information. Official product information ema.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  16. Inspectie Gezondheidszorg en Jeugd (IGJ) (2026). Leveren op artsenverklaring. Regulator igj.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  17. Minister van Volksgezondheid, Welzijn en Sport (2007). Regeling Geneesmiddelenwet, artikelen 3.17, 3.17a en 3.18 (ontheffing op artsenverklaring; vrijstelling bij tekort; gebruik in schrijnende gevallen). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0022160), version in force from 1 January 2026. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  18. Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) (2015). Judgment of 16 July 2015, Abcur AB v Apoteket Farmaci AB and Apoteket AB, Joined Cases C-544/13 and C-545/13. EUR-Lex (CELEX 62013CJ0544). Law eur-lex.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  19. ClinicalTrials.gov (2026). NCT06383390 — A Phase 3, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Event-Driven Study to Investigate the Effect of Retatrutide on the Incidence of Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events and Major Adverse Kidney Events in Participants With Body Mass Index ≥27 kg/m2 and Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease and/or Chronic Kidney Disease (TRIUMPH-Outcomes). Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  20. ClinicalTrials.gov (2026). NCT07165028 — A Master Protocol for a Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial of Multiple Pharmacologic Agents in Adult Participants With Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease Who Are at Increased Risk of Developing Major Adverse Liver Outcomes. Trial registration clinicaltrials.gov (opens an external site) — accessed 20 October 2026 ↩
  21. Centrale Commissie Mensgebonden Onderzoek (CCMO) (2026). Algemene informatie over meedoen aan onderzoek (IVO). Regulator ccmo.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  22. European Medicines Agency (2026). Clinical Trials Regulation. Regulator ema.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  23. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2014). Regulation (EU) No 536/2014 on clinical trials on medicinal products for human use. Official Journal of the European Union, L 158. Law eur-lex.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  24. European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2004). Regulation (EC) No 726/2004 laying down Union procedures for the authorisation and supervision of medicinal products for human use and establishing a European Medicines Agency (consolidated text of 28 January 2022). Official Journal of the European Union, L 136. Law eur-lex.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  25. Staten-Generaal / Koninkrijk der Nederlanden (1994). Burgerlijk Wetboek Boek 7, artikel 448 (WGBO: de arts licht de patiënt in). wetten.overheid.nl (BWBR0005290), version in force from 8 October 2026. Law wetten.overheid.nl (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩
  26. Court of Justice of the European Union (Third Chamber) (2012). Judgment of 29 March 2012, European Commission v Republic of Poland, Case C-185/10. EUR-Lex (CELEX 62010CJ0185). Law eur-lex.europa.eu (opens an external site) — accessed 22 October 2026 ↩